Appraisal News For Real Estate Professionals

2006/06/05

Undercover Operation Nets Two Arrests in Appraisal Scam - Applied Universal Mortgage Fraud Truths 101

In my recent blog post - Mortgage Fraud - "Universal Truths" - Part 1 - I listed Brad Geary's, Assistant Special Agent in Charge from HUD - Chicago, OIG Universal Truths of Mortgage Fraud listed below. According to Mr. Geary "Virtually all mortgage fraud combines at least two of these items."
  • Appraiser Fraud
  • SSN / Identity Fraud
  • Credit Reports / Letters of Explanation
  • Ernest Money & Closing Costs
  • Verification of Employment
  • Verification of Bank Statement (Deposits)
  • Verification of Landord
In a recent blog post "Illinois Undercover Operation Nets Two Arrests in Appraisal Scam" (Article Source - Morgage Fraud Blog ) we get a case study in Applied Universal Mortgage Fraud Truths 101. Let's see how many of these we can find as THIS mortgage fraud scheme unfolds: The mortgage fraud scheme as described by Przybylek involved Przybylek making an offer to a homeowner to purchase the homeowner’s property at an inflated price. Once the homeowner agreed to sell, Przybylek would get an appraiser to value the property at an inflated price and then find a buyer who would agree to purchase at the appraised value. Przybylek would then keep the difference as profit. The buyer would make a couple payments and then disappear. The informant met with Przybylek to discuss the scheme and agreed to participate – all the while wearing a wire. Most of the subsequent conversations were also recorded. In July 2005, the Secret Service obtained the use of a piece of property (1054 N. Lorel Avenue, Chicago, Illinois) The property was in very poor condition and was valued at $105,000. It had last been sold in 2000 for $72,000 and HUD took the property after the owner defaulted on the mortgage.
"At the time the property was put to use in the sting operation, the front and back doors didn’t latch properly or lock, a few of the windows were broken, the kitchen was gutted, with missing or broker floor tiles, there were no appliances or fixtures, water and gas pipes were sticking out of the wall, one of the bathrooms did not have an installed sink, there was no electricity or water to the house, much of the wood floors were dated and in poor condition, the carpet was old and stained, the attic did not have internal walls or a ceiling and portions of the exterior siding were falling off. "

Przybylek told the agent that he would create a fraudulent construction invoice for work that was never done and would show the invoice to his appraiser friend. He estimated that the appraised value would be $180,000 to $200,000. Przybylek provided the agent with a partially completed sales contract reflecting a sales price of $257,800. Espe acted as the appraiser and met Przybylek and the agent at the house. Espe said he forgot his camera and would use the photo from the assessor’s office. According to the affidavit, Espe told the agent that his job was to “play with the paperwork,” Two mortgage applications were submitted to First NLC by Quotemearate.com, Houston, TX. The mortgage packages contained a verification of employment signed by Przybylek verifying the borrower’s employment with Professional Home Builders. Other information was also incorrect in the loan package. The package also contained an appraisal by E.R. Espe, Aaron Company, Wilmete Illinois, signed by Erwin R. Espe valuing the property at $257,800.

The appraisal stated “House now has new electrical, plumbing was upgraded, significant amount of dry wall was replaced. Hardwood floors on first and second floors were refinished. Kitchen has new ceramic floor, a new front door to be installed immediately prior to move in or closing, new insulated windows on first and second floors, new carpeting in third floor bdrm and study, new carpeting in the family room.”
A few weeks after the appraisal, the agent inspected the house and although a few windows were placed in the front and back of the house and new siding was affixed to a portion of the back of the house, no other work had been done. The affidavit further states that the closing attorney indicated that the lien for the construction work would not be recorded but that a check would be issued from closing for the payment with the remaining proceeds to the seller. OK! How many of the "Universal Truths" do YOU think were involved!? If you enjoyed this post, subscribe and
get FREE updates! , , , , , , ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home